Most of the computer graphics cards are now having as much as 1 gigabyte of memory buffer for those resolution hog like when you play most games that you accidentally make it to the highest resolution possible, but the most part the memory buffer is not a really important for most high frame rates possible but it gives the graphics cards an independent way for it to acquire enough memory size to place those neat prizes into place to make a brilliant picture.
But now when you place a mainstream graphics card with enough frequency and memory interface bandwidth to play most if the games in high detail in about 60fps in the games like command and conquer red alert 3 or company of heroes, but when you replace the 512MB memory size into a large 1GB version kits for the graphics card you may have some mixed perspective of the advantages and disadvantages, first of all the GTS 250 is a mainstream card from the NVIDA makers, to replace the older 9-series with the same GPU architecture but fabricated into a smaller 55nm core and a smaller form factor and running in a much smaller power consumption that is 9800GTX and GTX+ cards, but when you put the equation of a 1GB you better have the memory buffer size being better than the usual resolution form the 512MB of being double the size and double the better frames in higher resolution. But the EVGA GTS 250 in a 1GB version is a good and a bad thing likewise it is costly by about $32 or so dollars online plus some bundles and the usual physical power supply and double slot design are all ticked in the package.
Which brings us to today and the introduction of yet another graphics card based on the G92 GPU, the GeForce GTS 250? This is probably the card that, by all rights, the 9800 GTX+ should have been, because it consolidates the gains that switching to a 55nm fab process can bring. Although its base clock speeds remain the same as the 9800 GTX+—738MHz for most of the GPU, 1836MHz for the shaders, and 1100MHz (or 2200 MT/s) for the GDDR3 memory—the GeForce GTS 250 is a physically smaller card, at nine inches long rather than 10.5″, and it has but a single six-pin auxiliary power connector onboard.
So for performance representation in the 1Gb version of the GTS 250 1GB version is just as a example, being one in the best in the store for just being only a mainstream variants, with the help of 1Gb version gives me a boost when we talk about the rate of the resolution in the screen. In low frame rates we don’t see any real difference on the performance, by just having only about the difference of about 5fps, but when we raise the bar on the resolution we can see a huge difference in the frames and also when you turn on the AAF settings when it uses more in the memory buffer to apply the pixel in the screen and able to save some frames, but not really making them, it the job of the GPU. Well EVGA GTS 250 1Gb version looks nice under the paper, a refurbished look of the old 9800GTX+ with better power consumption and performance, but the extra 1GB memory when you are playing about 1128*782 resolution wouldn’t be a good choice, better of with a 512MB.
http://videocardz.com/upload/evga_geforce_gts_250_superclocked_1gb_01.jpg